What this lesson is about
Year after year, the majority of professional stock-pickers fail to beat a simple index fund, here's the math behind why, and what it means for how you should actually invest.
Part 1 of 2
Every year, S&P's SPIVA report shows the same result: most actively managed U.S. stock funds can't beat their benchmark index over 10+ year periods. This isn't just a one-off issue. It's a consistent pattern that’s been around for decades.
Active funds typically have higher fees than passive index funds. Passive funds simply hold stocks in an index like the S&P 500 with little trading. Those higher fees need to be earned back through better stock-picking just to match the index. Actually beating it is even harder. Doing this consistently, year after year, across many managers, is extraordinarily tough.
Quick check
What has extensive long-term research (like S&P's SPIVA reports) generally found about actively managed funds versus their benchmark index?
Part 2 of 2
Quick check
Why do fees matter so much to an active fund's chances of beating its index over time?
Real recent performance comparison between an actively-managed growth ETF (ARKK) and the S&P 500 index (SPY).
Test what you just learned. Correct moves you up, wrong moves you down - reach 100 to master this lesson.