← Back to Learn Investing

Risk Parity: An Alternative Way to Build a Portfolio

Portfolio Construction and Risk • Beginner Investing • 7 min

What this lesson is about

Instead of allocating by dollars, a genuinely different philosophy allocates by risk CONTRIBUTION, a real strategy behind one of the most famous hedge fund approaches ever built.

2 parts · a quick check after each · then the quiz

Part 1 of 2

The 60/40 portfolio, discussed earlier in this module, splits your money this way: 60% in stocks and 40% in bonds. Risk parity takes a different approach. Instead of asking how much money to invest in each asset class, it focuses on the amount of risk each should contribute to the overall portfolio. The goal is to make those risk contributions equal across all assets. This difference is important. Stocks are usually much more volatile than bonds. Even in a classic 60/40 portfolio, where bonds take up a significant 40% of the dollar amount, stocks' higher volatility often leads them to dominate the portfolio's risk. It's estimated that more than 90% of a traditional 60/40 portfolio's total volatility comes from stocks, despite bonds having that substantial 40% share.

The efficient frontierEvery mix of two assets. The curve bends because they do not move together.

Quick check

What is the core idea behind "risk parity" as a portfolio construction philosophy?

Part 2 of 2

Risk parity tackles this issue head-on, often using leverage on lower-volatility assets like bonds. This approach boosts a lower-volatility asset's dollar exposure beyond 100% of the available unleveraged capital. The aim is to raise its risk contribution to match the risk from higher-volatility assets like stocks. The outcome is a portfolio where risk is spread more evenly among the asset classes, rather than allowing one class to overwhelm total risk, even when the dollar amounts seem balanced.

Insider Angle: Bridgewater Associates' "All Weather" strategy, linked to founder Ray Dalio, is a top example of risk parity in action. It’s designed to perform well across various economic conditions, like growth, recession, inflation, and deflation. By balancing risk contributions among asset classes suited to each scenario. This contrasts with traditional portfolios that often focus risk heavily on stocks. However, there are trade-offs with this strategy. While leverage is essential for achieving balanced risk contributions, it comes with its own risks. For instance, you could face forced deleveraging during market stress, along with sensitivity to borrowing costs and collateral requirements in volatile times. Risk parity isn’t a risk-free alternative. It’s a different way to spread and manage risk, with its own unique challenges.
Try This: Estimate the risk contribution in a simple hypothetical 60/40 portfolio. Use historical volatility figures for stocks and bonds. Stocks are often cited as about 3-4 times more volatile than high-quality bonds. What percentage of the total risk comes from the stock allocation, even though it’s only 60% of the dollar amount?

Quick check

Why does a traditional 60/40 portfolio (allocated by DOLLAR amount) actually have its risk dominated overwhelmingly by stocks, despite bonds making up 40% of the dollar allocation?

Quiz

Master this lesson

Test what you just learned. Correct moves you up, wrong moves you down - reach 100 to master this lesson.

0
/ 100
Log in to save your progress and earn XP.

Related lessons

Swipe for more